[1] Theory and practice. A theory is a concept within a person. A practice is the effect of a theory. Both activities are used in economies. For being economic people intelligently constructs theories; then practice them. I will propose definitions of person, morality, economy. Then propose my common sense theory.
[2] Chapter i. Definitions. Person is that organism with agency in economy. Agency is output of our neural organ, and it outputs our intellect. People’s agency has organic, personal, economic dynamics (Q) and by practicing these Q people produce economies — interactions of people. And my assumption is current economic theories are constructed when people practice Q; and this is someway with respect to morality. I assume both morality and economy make people — or people’s good — their objective.
[3] Morality’s definition was proposed in “Actuality Journal; Morality”. It relates to economy by this equation: economic activity is work and personal activity is morality: and all economic activity is personal. So person combines work and morality. And this parallels my assumption.
[4] Economy has been defined by interactions of people. And it is caused from allocating resources, stimulating and directing people, reproducing, and things along these lines that have to do with people. And this is similar for morality.
[5] Chapter ii. Theory. Some person P has three dynamics Q of organism, personality and economy. The organacity Q1 of P wants stimulation, energy and sex. His personality Q2 wants such pleasantries as play, philosophy and chess. Economy Q3 requires him to have shelter and work for the purpose of perfecting his life and acquiring resources. Q3 also comes first and causes Q1 and Q2. It (work) substantiates some person’s economic plan; so Q3=all(Q).
[6] P also has the complexities R to consider like what kind of work, personal documentation, taxation, creditability, personal relationships, location, transportation, fashion, resources &c. These R are only predicamental to P’s plan. But again Q3 will enable him to adapt all R. So if P is practicle enough and able to find work then his theory will be formulated. It will be Q3+practicality=all(Q)+all(R). So in theory all he needs in order to be economic is to work and do stuff; to act.
[7] For Q3 it is P’s economic predicament that should incline him towards appropriate work. It is up to programs and interaction in economy to provide people with good predicaments. According to his predicament he will have some workplaces within his economic boundary like eateries, factories, amusements &c to consider. These workplaces produce rewards equal to some $/hr and to such degree limit P. But such is his predicament. And he must consider Q3 with practicality but not conflate work with hobby (Q2) as has been common in young people’s imaginations.
[8] Assuming Q3 is obtainable then in theory all Q and all R will be accounted. They will evolve as more practical concerns: for shelter P applies at a nearby apartment complex. His documentation, taxation and location are already predetermined by his displacement. His bicycle and clothes are gotten from stores. Credit cards are gotten from banks. And so this theory and practice will really evolve once P finds work.
[9] And so by looking at people this economic theory was constructed that now is to be practiced by P. This was sensible as economies are composed of people and how they act. And so Any economic theory must come from studying people. And in this theory some point Q3 substantiated and evolved this theory. To get work and live organically, personally, economically is moral for P to do.
[10] My hypothesis in this theory has been implicit. I corresponded some person P’s economic life to morality; and said it was appropriate for P to practice this “economicomoral” theory. And This affirms another post “Actuality Journal; Morality”.
[11] But some conclusion will have to follow from practicing this. If P disproves my theory — that being economic is moral — by becoming not good and not perfect, then I will have errored. Not just errored but I will have done so against people; and this is exactly evil. It is synonymous to misappropriating someone; and this I mean never to do.
0 Comments