Impeached for THAT? (Comparing the Trump Articles of Impeachment - Real Law Review)

How do the Trump articles of impeachment compare to Nixon, Clinton, and Johnson? Legal Eagles get 2 months of unlimited learning on Skillshare for FREE:

From the New York Times:
A fiercely divided House Judiciary Committee approved two articles of impeachment against President Trump on Friday, setting up a historic vote before the full House that would make him only the third president to be impeached. The impeachment articles, passed over sharp Republican protests, accused the president of abusing the power of his office and obstructing Congress. The votes and a fractious two-day debate preceding them reflected the realities of the hyperpartisan divisions in American politics that have grown wider during Mr. Trump’s three years in office.
With back-to-back votes shortly after 10 a.m., the Democratic-controlled committee recommended that the House ratify the articles of impeachment against the 45th president, over howls of Republican protest. Each passed, 23 to 17, along strictly partisan lines. The full House is expected to vote on Wednesday to impeach Mr. Trump, and he would stand trial in the Senate in the new year.

(Thanks to Skillshare for sponsoring this video)

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Welcome to Real Law Review by LegalEagle; a series where I try to tackle the most important legal issues of the day. If you have a suggestion for the next topic leave your comment below.

And if you disagree, be sure to leave your comment in the form of an OBJECTION!

Remember to make your comments Stella-appropriate. Stella is the LegalBeagle and she wields the gavel of justice. DO NOT MESS WITH STELLA.

★More series on LegalEagle★
Real Lawyer Reacts:
Laws Broken:
Law 101:
Real Law Review:

All clips used for fair use commentary, criticism, and educational purposes. See Hosseinzadeh v. Klein, 276 F.Supp.3d 34 (S.D.N.Y. 2017); Equals Three, LLC v. Jukin Media, Inc., 139 F. Supp. 3d 1094 (C.D. Cal. 2015).

Typical legal disclaimer from a lawyer (occupational hazard): This is not legal advice, nor can I give you legal advice. Sorry! Everything here is for informational purposes only and not for the purpose of providing legal advice. You should contact your attorney to obtain advice with respect to any particular issue or problem. Nothing here should be construed to form an attorney client relationship. Also, some of the links in this post may be affiliate links, meaning, at no cost to you, I will earn a small commission if you click through and make a purchase. But if you click, it really helps me make more of these videos!

========================================================


★ Tweet me @legaleagleDJ
★ More vids on Facebook: ➜
★ Stella’s Insta:
★ For promotional inquiries please reach out here: legaleagle@standard.tv

Legaleagle,legal eagle,breaking news,case,congress,court case,crime,guilty,jury,latest news,news,not guilty,political,politics,politics news,scotus,supreme court,the trial,trial,Verdict,copyright,law advice,legal analysis,lawyer,attorney,Real lawyer,Real law review,impeachment,donald trump,impeachment inquiry,articles of impeachment,impeachment hearing,impeachment vote,